User agent detail

MOT-W408g/[TFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX]UP.Browser/ (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaW408gclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.048 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.09101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-W408g closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave close MotorolaW408gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.23201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser MotorolaW408gsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaW408gcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave MotorolaW408gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close MotorolaW408gFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser close MotorolaW408gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:36 | by ThaDafinser