User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SmartHub; SMART-TV; U; Linux/SmartTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WebBrowser/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Webkit 531.2 televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 531.2 SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Maple Browser 1.0closeGNU/Linux Samsung Smart TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:34 | by ThaDafinser