User agent detail

Kenshoo/3049 CFNetwork/672.0.2 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Kenshoo 0.0WebKit unknowniOS 7.0Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Kenshoo WebKit iOS 7.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Kenshoo closeiOS closecloseMobile Deviceyesyesclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Kenshoo 3049closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

closeiOS 7.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
iOS 7.0yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 672.0.2closeiOS 7.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iOS 7.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:27 | by ThaDafinser