User agent detail

QQBrowser/14 (Linux; U; 2.2.2; en-us; Motorola XT316 BUILD/FRG83G) Mobile/0050
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
QQ Browser 14close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
QQBrowser 14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QQ Browser 1.4closeLinux MotorolaXT316mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
QQ Browser 14 GNU/Linux MotorolaFiresmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser 14closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QQ Browser 14 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QQ Browser 1.4 Linux MotorolaXT316mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
QQBrowser 14closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:27 | by ThaDafinser