User agent detail

PANTECH-C570/R01 Browser/Obigo/Q05A Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1,gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PantechC570closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.027 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.055 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PANTECH-C570 R01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM PantechC570mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q05A PantechC570smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close PantechC570closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q05A Browser Q05A closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A PantechC570mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose PantechC570Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q05Aclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:27 | by ThaDafinser