User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-T669V/T669VTKC5 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/1.5 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSGH-T669Vclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-SGH-T669V T669VTKC5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Dolfin 1.5closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Dolphin 1.5close SamsungSGH-T669Vmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Dolphin 1.5WebKit SamsungSGH-T669Vsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungSGH-T669Vcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.21701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Dolfin 1.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.086 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Dolfin 1.5 SamsungSGH-T669Vmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungSGH-T669Vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:26 | by ThaDafinser