User agent detail

Cyberdog/2.0 (Macintosh; 68k)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Cyberdog 2.0unknown unknownMac68K unknownAppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Cyberdog 2.0closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Cyberdog 2.0 Mac68K AppleMacintoshDesktop0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Cyberdog 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

closeMacOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.39202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Cyberdog 2.0closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.21101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Cyberdog 2.0closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:22 | by ThaDafinser