User agent detail

MOT-V365/08.C8.37R MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaV365closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV365Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-V365 08.C8.37Rcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close MotorolaV365mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
MotorolaV365smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV365closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.12101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V365closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.34402 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 MotorolaV365mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close MotorolaV365Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MIB 2.2.1close MotorolaV365closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:20 | by ThaDafinser