User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0.1) Gecko/20120802 OSRE/2.0.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-nokiaxpress.yaml
Nokia Xpress Gecko 5.0.1 mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 5.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:5.0.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 5.0.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 5.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0.1Gecko 20120802Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Nokia Xpress Gecko 5.0.1 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:18 | by ThaDafinser