User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 440x240 Samsung SCH-U940 NetFront/3.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSCH-U940closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.042 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
NetFront 3.4close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.4close SamsungSCH-U940mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungSCH-U940smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungSCH-U940closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.4 SamsungSCH-U940 NetFrontmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
NetFront 3.4close SamsungSCH-U940Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.0306 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.4close SamsungU940closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:17 | by ThaDafinser