User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 F900i(c100;TB;W18H10)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close DoCoMoF900iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
i-mode Browser 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
i-mode Browser 2.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront closeSymbian OS DoCoMoF900imobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
DoCoMoF900ifeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoF900icloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

F900icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
FujitsuF900imobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo F900icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close DoCoMoF900iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
DoCoMo 2.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:12 | by ThaDafinser