User agent detail

Links (2.1pre23; Linux 3.5.0 i686; 237x63)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Links 2.1Text-based GNU/Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Links 2.1 Linux Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Links 2.1closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Links 2.1pre23closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Links 2.1Text-based GNU/Linux desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Links 2.1closeLinux 3.5.0closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Links 2.1 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Links 2.1pre23closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links 2.1pre23 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Links 2.1 Linux closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links 2.1pre23closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:02 | by ThaDafinser