User agent detail

DoCoMo//2.0 N905i(c100;TB;W24H16) (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Googlebot-Mobile 2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesGoogle Bot MobileBot/Crawler0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesGoogle Bot Mobileclose0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DoCoMo closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesGoogleclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.20101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebot-Mobileclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotCrawler0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Googlebot Mobile 2.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesGooglebot Mobileclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebot Mobileclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
DoCoMo close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:02 | by ThaDafinser