User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; HP-UX 9000/785; es-ES; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020827 Netscape/7.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Netscape 7.0Gecko unknownHP-UX unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 7.0Gecko HP-UX Desktop0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 7.0closeHP-UX closecloseDesktopclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 7.0closeHP-UX desktop-browsercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 7.0Gecko HP-UX 9000desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.0close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 7.0Gecko 1.0.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Netscape 7.0closeHP-UX closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 7.0Gecko 20020827a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 7.0Gecko 1.0.1HP-UX desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 7.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:58 | by ThaDafinser