User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; MXit WebBot/1.8.3.119) Opera Mini/3.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
MXit WebBot 1.8.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera Mini 3.1Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera Mini 3.1closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 3.1closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera Mini 3.1closeJVM OperaMini 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera Mini 3.1close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesMXit WebBotclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 8.01 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Mini 3.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40002 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera Mini 3.1closeJ2ME/MIDP Device closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:56 | by ThaDafinser