User agent detail

LG-CU6160/1.0 UP.Browser/4.1.26l
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGCU6160closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1close closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-CU6160 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26lclose LGCU6160mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 LGCU6160smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.26close LGCU6160closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26l LGLGCU6160closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 4.1 LGCU6160mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGCU6160Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26lclose LGCU6160closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:46 | by ThaDafinser