User agent detail

Samsung-SCHR330 Infraware-Polaris/6.0 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSCHR330closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Samsung-SCHR330 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Polaris 6.0closeJVM SamsungSCHR330 Infraware-Polarismobile-browseryescloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungSCHR330smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSCHR330closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Polaris 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Polaris 6.0 SamsungSCHR330 Infraware-Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSCHR330closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:42 | by ThaDafinser