User agent detail

LinksCrawler 0.1beta
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
yesLinksCrawlerBot/Crawler0 Detail
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
LinksCrawler 0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesLinksCrawlerBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesLinksCrawlerclose0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LinksCrawler closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesLinksCrawlerclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Links 0.1betaclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:38 | by ThaDafinser