User agent detail

NCSA Mosaic/2.6b1 [en-gb] (X11;UNIX_System_V 4.2 R4000) libwww/2.12 modified
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-mosaic.yaml
NCSA Mosaic 2.6 UNIX System V 4.2desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyeslibwwwclose0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
NCSA closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NCSA Mosaic 2.6b1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NCSA_Mosaic 2.6b1closeUnix closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mosaic 2.6b1 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NCSA Mosaic 2.6 UNIX System V 4.2desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Mosaic 2.6b1closeUnix closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:37 | by ThaDafinser