User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) QupZilla/1.6.6 Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
QupZilla 1.6.6Webkit 538.1FreeBSD desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 538.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QupZilla 1.6.6closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit FreeBSD desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QupZilla 1.6.6closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 538.1WebKit 538.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.19101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QupZilla 1.6.6WebKit 538.1FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QupZilla 1.6.6Webkit 538.1FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
QupZilla 1.6.6closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:37 | by ThaDafinser