User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) KomodiaBot/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesKomodiaBotBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesKomodiaBotBot/Crawler0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesKomodiaBotclose0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows 6.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesKomodiaBotclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:36 | by ThaDafinser