User agent detail

SonyEricssonT200/R101
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SonyEricssonT200closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SonyEricssonT200 R101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close Sony EricssonT200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Sony EricssonT200smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonT200closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.14801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Sony EricssonSony Ericsson T200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Sony EricssonT200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SonyEricssonT200Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close SonyEricssonT200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:32 | by ThaDafinser