User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; mimic; rv:9.3.0) Clecko/20120101 Classilla/CFM
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Classilla 0.0Clecko unknownMacPPC unknownAppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Classilla 9.3.0closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Classilla Clecko MacPPC AppleMacintoshDesktop0.044 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 9.3.0closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:9.3.0closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 9.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 9.3.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Classilla 9.3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 9.3.0 Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Classilla 9.3.0closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:32 | by ThaDafinser