User agent detail

INGRID/2.0 (http://spsearch.ilse.nl/; Startpagina dochter links spider)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
INGRID 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesIlseBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesIlseclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
INGRID 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesINGRIDclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Links close closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:31 | by ThaDafinser