User agent detail

Yeti/1.0 (+http://help.naver.com/robots/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesNaverBotclose0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Yeti 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesNaver Yeticlose0.21501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesYeti/NaverbotSearch bot0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYeticlose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYetiCrawler0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesNaver Yeticlose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesNaver Yeticlose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:30 | by ThaDafinser