User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-us; lg-lg420g[tf012125009345399008080015075895332] obigo) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/70/352/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGlg420gclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.10501 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close LGlg420gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.3 LG420gsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close LGlg420gcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser LGLGlg420gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo LGlg420gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close LGlg420gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:30 | by ThaDafinser