User agent detail

Mozilla/3.01 (compatible; Netgem/3.6.8; netbox; Linux 2.2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux 2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netgem Set Top Box Linux TVTV Device0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netgem Set Top Box closeLinux closecloseTV Deviceclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetBox 3.6.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 3.01closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 2.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 3.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 3.1 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Linux closeclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetBox closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:30 | by ThaDafinser