User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S3600C/1.0 RTK-E/1.0 DF/1.0 Release/07.01.2008 Browser/NetFront3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-S3600Cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-S3600C 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.4closeJVM SamsungGT S3600Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront NetFront SamsungGT-S3600Csmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S3600Ccloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netfront Browser 3.4 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.4 SamsungGT-S3600Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SamsungGT S3600CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.4close SamsungGT-S3600Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:29 | by ThaDafinser