User agent detail

Mozilla/4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.9-RC i386)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeFreeBSD 4.9closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Communicator 4.6.1closeFreeBSD 4.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
FreeBSD 4.9desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.61closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeFreeBSD 4.9closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.61 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.61 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Communicator 4.6.1 FreeBSD 4.9desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:28 | by ThaDafinser