User agent detail

MOT-V1075/85.97.C6P MIB/BER2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaV1075closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-V1075 85.97.C6Pcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Motorola Internet Browser close MotorolaV1075mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
MotorolaV1075smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV1075closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MIB close closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V1075closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser MotorolaV1075mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close MotorolaV1075Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MIB BER2.2close MotorolaV1075closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:24 | by ThaDafinser