User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux; U) Version/12.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.17 Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 12.17Presto 2.12Linux Desktop0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 12.17closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 12.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 12.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 12.17Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 12.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.17closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 12.17 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 12.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 12.17 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 12.17 Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.17closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 12.17closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:22 | by ThaDafinser