User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040707 Lightningspider/0.9.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Lightningspider 0.9.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.7closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.7closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesLightningspiderclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.7closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.7closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.7Gecko 20040707Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:18 | by ThaDafinser