User agent detail

iBrowser/Mini2.5 (LG-T375)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-ibrowser.yaml
iBrowser Mini 2.5 T375mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
iBrowser 2.5WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
iBrowser 2.5close closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
iBrowser Mini2.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

IBrowse close LGT375desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IBrowse LGT375smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
iBrowser Mini 2.5close LGT375closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGT375closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iBrowser Mini 2.5 LGT375mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IBrowse rclose LGT375closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:17 | by ThaDafinser