User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; GomezAgent 2.0; Windows NT)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
closecloseyesGomezAgentclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IE 5.01Trident WinNT Desktop0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 5.01closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 5.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 5.01closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 5.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGomezAgentclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 5.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 5.1Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesGomezAgentclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:16 | by ThaDafinser