User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-KM900/V10l Browser/Obigo-Q7.1 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGKM900closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.042 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 7.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 7.1close LGKM900mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGKM900smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.1close LGKM900closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser LGLGKM900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7.1 LGKM900mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-KM900closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close LGKM900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:12 | by ThaDafinser