User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X) PowerPoint/14.43.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
PowerPoint 2010Trident unknownMacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
PowerPoint 2010Trident MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.025 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
PowerPoint 2010closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopclose0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.21501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OS X desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:12 | by ThaDafinser