User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S3970_TD/1.0 RTK-E/1.0 SHP/VPP-R5 Release/04.20.2011 Browser/Dolfin2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 SMM-MMS/1.2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-dolfin.yaml
Dolfin 2.1 GT-S3970mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-S3970 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Dolfin 2.1close SamsungGT-S3970mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Dolphin WebKit SamsungGT-S3970smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S3970closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Dolfin 2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Dolfin 2.1 SamsungGT-S3970mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Dolfin 2.1close SamsungGT-S3970closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:12 | by ThaDafinser