User agent detail

Mozilla/4.1 (compatible; Teleca Q7; BMP 1.0.1; U; en) 240X400 LGE UN510 Novarra-Vision/8.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGUN510closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Novarra Vision 8.0closeBrew MP 1.0.1LGUN510mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Brew 1.0LGUN510smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser closeBrew MP 1.0.1LGUN510closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.1 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Vision Mobile Browser 8.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Novarra Vision 8.0 Brew MP 1.0.1LGUN510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7close LGUN510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:11 | by ThaDafinser