User agent detail

Links (2.8; ULTRIX 4.5 VAX; GNU C 1; text)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-unix.yaml
Links 2.8 ULTRIX 4.5desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Links 2.8close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Links 2.8Text-based 0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Links 2.8close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Links 2.8closeGNU closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links 2.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.26401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Links 2.8 ULTRIX 4.5desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links 2.8close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:07 | by ThaDafinser