User agent detail

ichiro/5.0 (http://help.goo.ne.jp/door/crawler.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
ichiro 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesIchiro BotBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesIchiro Botclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ichiro 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesichiro/5.0close0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesichiro0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesichiroclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesichiroCrawler0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesIchiroclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesgooclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:06 | by ThaDafinser