User agent detail

KreaTVWebKit/531 (Motorola STB; Linux)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/kreatv.yaml
Webkit 531 televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
KreaTVWebKit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close media-playercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux MotorolaSTBsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

WebKit 531closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 531Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 531 MotorolaKreaTVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:05 | by ThaDafinser