User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534+ (KHTML, like Gecko) FireWeb/1.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows 6.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

FireWeb 1.0.0.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Fireweb 1.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
FireWeb 1.0.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
FireWeb 1.0.0.0Webkit 534Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:05 | by ThaDafinser