User agent detail

Opera/6.12 (Solaris 9; U ) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Opera 6.12 Solaris 9desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.12closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.12Presto Solaris desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.12close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.12close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.12close closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.12 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.12 Solaris 9desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.12closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.12closeSolaris closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:04 | by ThaDafinser