User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; AmigaOS4.0) IBrowse 2.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
IBrowse 2.3 AmigaOS 4.0desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.027 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 5.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IBrowse closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IBrowse 2.3 AmigaOS 4.0desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 5.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.5close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 5.5closeAmigaOS 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 5.5Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
IBrowse 2.3 AmigaOS 4.0desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IBrowse 2.3closeAmigaOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:04 | by ThaDafinser