User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/536(KHTML, like Gecko) NX/3.0 (DTV; HTML; R1.0;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/browser-nx.yaml
NetFront NX 3.0Webkit 536 televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 536closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront NX 3.0close media-playercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 536closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront NX WebKit 536Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront NX 3.0Webkit 536 televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:03 | by ThaDafinser