User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) KHTML/4.9.5 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-295.php
Konqueror 4.9KHTML 4.9Linux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.9KHTML 4.9Linux Desktop0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.9closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.9closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.9KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.9closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.9.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.9 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.9KHTML 4.9.5Linux desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.9closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:03 | by ThaDafinser