User agent detail

Mozilla/4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux 2.2.12closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 4.6Gecko Linux Desktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 4.6closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Communicator 4.6.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.61closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 2.2.12closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.61 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.61 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Communicator 4.6.1 Linux desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:00 | by ThaDafinser