User agent detail

Opera/4.03 (Windows NT 4.0; U)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 4.03 Windows NT 4.0desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera WinNT 4.0Desktop0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 4.03closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 4.03closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 4.03Presto Windows NTdesktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 4.03closeWindows NT 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 4.3closeWindows NT 4.0 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 4.03 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 4.03closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.082 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 4.3 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 4.03 Windows NT 4.0desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 4.03closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 4.03closeWindows NT 4.0Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 4.03closeWindows NT 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:05:00 | by ThaDafinser