User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNGSGH-i450)UC AppleWebkit(like Gecko) Safari/530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser Gecko Series60 i450mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 530close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser closeSeries60 Samsungi450mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit SamsungSGH-i450smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser Gecko Series60 Samsungi450mobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari close Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:58 | by ThaDafinser