User agent detail

Microsoft Office/16.0 (Microsoft Outlook Mail 16.0.6310; Pro)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
Outlook 2016Trident unknownunknown unknownunknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Outlook 2016Trident Desktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Outlook 2016close closecloseDesktopclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Microsoft closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeChromeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Microsoft Outlook close desktop-browsercloseclose0.26302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Microsoft Outlook 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Microsoft Outlook desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Microsoft Office close Microsoftcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:55 | by ThaDafinser